Biden and Obama Finally Have Tough Questions to Answer

© ignoranceorapathy.com Oct 27th 2008

Wow it would seem Joe Biden and Barack Obama are just having a tough week with the media.
First you have the 2001 Public Radio interview with Obama were in he discusses exactly how he wants to take you money and give it to his followers. He does not discuss "redistributing wealth" as to whether the practice is right or wrong, he argues the best method, legislative or judicial. He also argues that the Constitution is not being interpreted his way, his redistributive way.
(click read more to for clips)

Follow up:

Also Check out the rather interesting review of this tape and it's implications over at National Review Online.

Then this little gem pops up, Barbara West (my new favorite reporter) askes Biden to explain how Obama's Marxists plans are not Marxist.
Oh shame on you WFTV you pulled the video! Did the Obama camp get to you?
Thats Ok We can still see it

WFTV Site with Video

Now Biden is in trouble with another reporter, and then called his daddy Obama to make sure no more interviews with CBS 3 Philli would be done.

Also there is another tape that is missing. Reported in many places:

The L.A. Times Suppresses Obama’s Khalidi Bash Tape
Obama, Ayers, and PLO supporters toast Edward Said’s successor, but the press doesn’t think it’s quite as newsworthy as Sarah Palin’s wardrobe.
By Andrew C. McCarthy at National Review Online

Let’s try a thought experiment. Say John McCain attended a party at which known racists and terror mongers were in attendance. Say testimonials were given, including a glowing one by McCain for the benefit of the guest of honor ... who happened to be a top apologist for terrorists. Say McCain not only gave a speech but stood by, in tacit approval and solidarity, while other racists and terror mongers gave speeches that reeked of hatred for an American ally and rationalizations of terror attacks.

Now let’s say the Los Angeles Times obtained a videotape of the party.

Question: Is there any chance — any chance — the Times would not release the tape and publish front-page story after story about the gory details, with the usual accompanying chorus of sanctimony from the oped commentariat? Is there any chance, if the Times was the least bit reluctant about publishing (remember, we’re pretending here), that the rest of the mainstream media (y’know, the guys who drove Trent Lott out of his leadership position over a birthday-party toast) would not be screaming for the release of the tape?

Do we really have to ask?

No we don't have to ask, they and all the other MSM would be shouting from the rooftops!

Bookmark this article at ...