Questions about Obama Never End

Link: http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html

© ignoranceorapathy.com 11/15/2008
One question the Obama camp dodged was about Barack's selective service registration.
I had to register with Selective Service in 1984 when I turned 18, so did Obama also register as was the law in 1980?
A scan of documents aquired under a freedom of information act request can be found at Debbie Schlussel's site: debbieschlussel.com
Article titled: Did Next Commander-in-chief Falsify Selective Service Registration? Never Actually Register? Obama's Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions

I cannot verifiy the validity of the claims made on the Debbie Schlussel website but the questions have to be asked or they cannot be answered. I have been searching for my "draft card" but it was issued in 1984 and not too long after I received it I joined the National Guard and then went into the Regular Army so keeping it was not a priority. I wanted to compare the numbers as Debbie and her contact, a retired federal employee have done with the scan of Obama’s.

Follow up:

Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?

It's either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama's official Selective Service registration for the draft. A friend of mine, who is a retired federal agent, spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and released it to me.

But the release of Obama's draft registration and an accompanying document, posted below, raises more questions than it answers. And it shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama's claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was required by law.

Document Location Number Indicates Obama Selective Service Form was Created in 2008

First, there is the Document Location Number (DLN) on the form. In the upper right hand corner of the Selective Service form SSS Form 1, there is the standard Bates-stamped DLN, in this case "0897080632," which I've labeled as "A" on both the SSS Form and the computer printout document. On the form, it reflects a 2008 creation, but on the printout, an extra eight was added in front of the number to make it look like it is from 1980, when it was actually created in 2008.

As the retired federal agent notes:

Having worked for the Federal Government for several decades, I know that the standardization of DLNs have the first two digits of the DLN representing the year of issue. That would mean that this DLN was issued in 2008. The DLN on the computer screen printout is the exact same number, except an 8 has been added to make it look like it is from 1980 and give it a 1980 DLN number. And 1980 is the year Senator/President Elect Obama is said to have timely registered. So, why does the machine-stamped DLN reflect this year (2008) and the DLN in the database (which was manually input) reflect a "corrected" DLN year of 1980? Were all the DLNs issued in 1980 erroneously marked with a 2008 DLN year or does the Selective Service use a different DLN system then the rest of the Federal Government? Or was the SSS Form 1 actually processed in 2008 and not 1980?

It's quite a "coincidence" . . . that is, if you believe in coincidences, especially in this case.

Something else I found very interesting about the scan of Obama’s card, it is one of my pet peeves. The United States Postal Service is NOT a branch of the federal government anymore. It was known as the United States Post Office back when it was in fact a functionary of the federal government. U.S. Postmarks and stamps have reflected the new name since the change. Yet Obama’s card has the old and outdated stamp on it, long after the change occurred.

Postal Stamp is Incorrect, Discontinued in 1970

Then, there is the question as to whether the Postal Stamp is real. The "postmark" stamp--labeled "E"--is hard to read, but it is clear that at the bottom is "USPO" which stands typically for United States Post Office. However, current "postmark" validator, registry, or round dater stamps (item 570 per the Postal Operations Manual) shows "USPS" for United States Postal Service. The change from Post Office to Postal Service occurred on August 12, 1970, when President Nixon signed into law the most comprehensive postal legislation since the founding of the Republic--Public Law 91-375. The new Postal Service officially began operations on July 1, 1971.
Why was an old, obsolete postmark round dater stamp used almost ten (10) years after the fact to validate a legal document . . . that just happened to be Barack Obama's suspicious Selective Service registration form?

There is also a question about the authenticity of the original submission as the postal clerk appears to have marked the form that the presentor had No ID.

Form Shows Barack Obama didn't have ID

The SSS Form 1 states "NO ID", labeled "F". Since that's the case, then how did the Hawaiian postal clerk know that the submitter was really Barack H. Obama, who may have been on summer break from attending Occidental College in California. How would they determine whether the registrant was truly registering and not a relative, friend, or other imposter?

I would suggest going over to Debbie’s site and reading the full contents of the post. It makes for another in a long list of questions about our would be President-Elect.
(I do not refer to anyone who wins the general election as President-Elect until after the Electoral College meets and casts their votes, as that is how our constitution prescribes a President is actually elected)

Questions, Questions everywhere and not an answer insight.
Or could the answer be just a simple, like his predecessor Bill Clinton, Obama just wanted to be a draft dodger? How romantic.

Bookmark this article at ...